Now you're adding to my confusion, in the very leastĭBpoweramp reads once and compares to AccurateRip. It seems this is a pretty wide-spread misconception about ripping. The difference is what is done with these burst reads. In fact, all reads are burst reads in all rippers regardless of the configuration. All passes in dBpoweramp are burst passes. Quote from: Porcus on 11:39:16 I'd say AccurateRip integration is better in dBpoweramp (which checks after first burst rip, and invokes secure mode only if unmatched) dBpoweramp and EAC both provide proven results and foobar2000 v1.0 may now be on an even footing.
There have been no comprehensive study of which ripper produces the most accurate rips in problem cases.
Some rippers simply return more reliable results than others. Basically any ripper capable of reading HTOA and handling offsets can potentially be a secure ripper if the release can be verified against an AccurateRip entry.
Anyone saying one or the other is "best" without clarification is oversimplifying.I usually hate these kinds of posts, but here goes anyhow: +1Ī13xth0rn3, please read our Terms of Service, paying attention to point 8. Quote from: a13xth0rn3 on 13:56:03 in my opinion EAC is by far the best cd ripper providing you configure your drive correctly (you will find set up guides if you search with google) i wouldnt rip a cd any other way.I don't think things are so clear cut any more.
0 kommentar(er)
